UNIONS COMMEMORATE ANIVERSARY OF WINNING THE WEEKEND

Just before we learned that the Coalition, should it win the next election, will wind back workers’ rights, the union movement celebrated the 77th anniversary of winning the right to a weekend. 

Prior to 1947, many workers were compelled to work as much as twelve hours a day, six days a week. On September 8, 1947, following years of sustained union campaigning, the Commonwealth Arbitration Court ruled in favour of a forty-hour, five-day working week. 

The union campaign for the right to a weekend was opposed by business groups and conservative politicians at the time, who argued it would negatively impact businesses and the economy. 

In 1947, the President of the Chamber of Manufacturers, Cecil N. McKay, commented: 

“Australia is committed to an unnecessary and dangerous experiment in the midst of an inflationary period, and it is to be hoped that the burden will not fall too heavily upon those whom it was intended to benefit” 

Unions currently face the same arguments, almost word-for-word, from employer groups about the modern work-life balance and the right to disconnect. It is also (probably) what the Vizier told Ramesses III when artisans went on strike in the Valley of the Kings in 1158 BC. 

Read more: ACTU Media release 

Share Tweet

RELATED

MASSACHUSETTS RIDESHARE DRIVERS UNION MAKES U.S. HISTORY
Massachusetts rideshare drivers made labour history last week by forming the first officially recognised rideshare union in the United States. Almost 70,000 rideshare drivers in the state can now bargain collectively after...
Read More
$1.1M FINE FOR CLEANAWAY AFTER 10 YEAR BATTLE
Waste management company Cleanaway has been fined a record $1.1 million for two category-2 breaches of federal work safety laws relating to an Adelaide truck crash that killed two members of the...
Read More
ELECTROCUTION CASE APPEAL RESULTS IN SIX-FOLD FINE INCREASE
An appeal of the 2025 sentencing of AAD Civil Construction Pty Ltd following an electrocution incident has seen their fine increased six-fold and a conviction recorded against the company.
Read More