STRONGER PROTECTIONS FOR FRONTLINE WORKERS

Following on from our story earlier this year attacks on, or threats against, federal frontline workers, such as those employed by Centrelink and the ATO, will attract longer jail penalties after Albanese Government legislation passed Parliament last week.

The passage of the Criminal Code Amendment (Protecting Commonwealth Frontline Workers) Bill followed a Senate inquiry that recommended its passage without amendment.

The law now places frontline workers on the same level as judicial and law enforcement officers, with higher penalties for aggravated offenses.

The definition of ‘Commonwealth frontline worker’ includes public officials who interact directly with the public as a primary job function, covering roles at Centrelink, ATO, airports, and the Australian Electoral Commission.

The maximum penalty for harming a frontline worker rises from 10 to 13 years in prison, and for threatening serious harm from 7 to 9 years in prison.

In our view prevention is always better than the dealing with the aftermath of an incident. These reforms should be accompanied by a review of controls such as the systems of work and staffing levels.

For information on preventing and responding to occupational violence visit our webpage.

Share Tweet

RELATED

MASSACHUSETTS RIDESHARE DRIVERS UNION MAKES U.S. HISTORY
Massachusetts rideshare drivers made labour history last week by forming the first officially recognised rideshare union in the United States. Almost 70,000 rideshare drivers in the state can now bargain collectively after...
Read More
$1.1M FINE FOR CLEANAWAY AFTER 10 YEAR BATTLE
Waste management company Cleanaway has been fined a record $1.1 million for two category-2 breaches of federal work safety laws relating to an Adelaide truck crash that killed two members of the...
Read More
ELECTROCUTION CASE APPEAL RESULTS IN SIX-FOLD FINE INCREASE
An appeal of the 2025 sentencing of AAD Civil Construction Pty Ltd following an electrocution incident has seen their fine increased six-fold and a conviction recorded against the company.
Read More