Swedish researchers have examined work-directed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions and team-based support programs involving nearly 3,000 workers suffering from depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders, or ‘reactions to severe stress’.
The researchers found that such programs help workers with mental disorders return to work and improve outcomes after a year compared to standard care. However, they caution that employers should be aware of the ethical considerations arising from their use, and that the findings should be cautiously interpreted due to a lack of well-designed studies.
The review identified several ethical issues:
Guilt and Shame: Interventions might increase feelings of guilt and shame in workers by focusing on their mental health rather than workplace problems and systems issues.
Loss of Autonomy: Increased cooperation between workers, employers, and healthcare or insurer representatives can undermine workers' autonomy and control over their personal information.
Informed Decisions: Workers' mental disorder symptoms might hinder their ability to make informed and autonomous decisions.
Voluntary Participation: Ethical questions arise about whether workers' participation is truly voluntary and if they can control intervention elements.
Privacy Concerns: Workers may struggle to withhold personal and health-related information from their employers during support meetings.
Common Goal vs. Ethical Costs: While the goal of these interventions is to reintegrate employees back to work, they come with ethical costs for workers and stakeholders.
Unions and HSRs should be mindful of such considerations when be consulted regarding any proposals to introduce work-directed interventions.
Review the study in full here.
