RETURN-TO-OFFICE CONFLICT

When discussing strategies to address conflicts arising from the return to office work, ‘workplace change specialist’ Dr. Brenda Jamnik, emphasises the importance of investing in happy and psychologically safe workplaces amid increasing conflict between workers and bosses over returning to the office.

While pressure mounts on workers to return to the office, Dr. Jamnik warns that success in this effort may be hollow without addressing psychological safety issues.

Dr. Jamnik identifies five key factors for ensuring worker happiness: being heard, trust, leadership that encourages learning from mistakes, fostering an adaptive environment, and promoting collaboration.

The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted perspectives on remote work, with varying views on its effectiveness compared to office work.

While remote work can benefit both employers and employees, fair establishment of remote work arrangements is crucial to their success.

Employers need to be aware there can be as many psychological implications from working form home as working in the office and should invest in creating psychologically safe cultures that prevent conflict.

Dr. Jamnik suggests measuring employee happiness through online surveys and addressing issues such as stress, workload, resource inadequacy, and harassment.

Source: OHS Alert, 10 April

Share Tweet

RELATED

MUA, VTHC & FoE INVITE YOU TO BASS STRAIT CLEAN-UP CAMPAIGN
The MUA, VTHC and FoE invite you to an afternoon of music, solidarity and action, to raise funds for the campaign to clean-up Bass Strait. With Esso and Woodside trying their best...
Read More
EMPLOYERS MUST PROTECT WORKERS FROM PSYCHOLOGICAL HAZARD OF RACISM
The Australian Institute of Health and Safety (AIHS) has released a Position Statement warning employers, regulators and policymakers that they must recognise the harm that workplace racism can cause to workers' health,...
Read More
OPERATOR FINED $20K FOR RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT AFTER CRANE TIP-OVER
A mobile crane operator has been convicted and fined $20,000 for his breach of s.32 of the OHS Act – reckless endangerment placing other persons at a workplace at risk of serious...
Read More