Prosecutions

It is interesting how decisions vary greatly depending on where a matter is heard. The following two recent prosecutions illustrate this. In the first, a company was convicted and fined for not providing fall protection, a SWMS and supervision to an apprentice. It was fortunate that the young worker did not fall before the situation was remedied. 

In the second case, where a worker's hand was crushed and three of his fingers 'degloved' and could not work for months, the employer was not convicted but sentenced to an 'adjourned undertaking for a period of 12 months', and to pay $12,000 to the Court Fund. 

Carpentry firm convicted and fined $10,000 for lack of fall protection

David Franklin Builders P/L was doing carpentry works at a residential construction site at Black Hill. A WorkSafe Inspector attending the workplace in October 2019 observed a third year apprentice standing on wall plates at the edge of the two story townhouse with no fall protection to prevent a fall. There was no supervision of the apprentice. The company did not have a SWMS for the work. The inspector issued a prohibition notice prohibiting all carpentry works associated with truss erection and box gutter construction. On 13 December 2019 the inspector re-attended the workplace: hand railing and scaffolding was in place, and a SWMS was produced. 

In sentencing the offender, the Ballarat Magistrates Court acknowledged the offender’s good character, lack of priors and early plea of guilty. The company was convicted and fined $10,000, plus costs of $1,662.

Worker suffers serious damage to hand

Cyco Systems Corporation P/L manufactures parts for high performance automotive engines at a small factory at Mentone. On 18 July 2019 an incident occurred when an employee's hand made contact with the linishing belt of a lathe  used in the assembly process. The incident resulted in the degloving of his small, ring and middle fingers, hyperextension of his index finger, as well as the removal of a nail. He underwent an operation and was unable to work for two to three months. The court found the company had failed to reduce or eliminate the risk of serious injury by providing adequate guarding. 

Cyco Systems pleaded guilty and was without conviction sentenced to an adjourned undertaking for a period of 12 months, and to pay $12,000 to the Court Fund with costs of $1,891.

To check for more Victorian prosecutions before the next edition, go to WorkSafe Victoria's Prosecution Result Summaries and Enforceable Undertakings webpage. 

Share Tweet

RELATED

FORKLIFT STRIKE RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER ENFORCEABLE UNDERTAKINGS DELIVER ACCOUNTABILITY
Godfrey Hirst Australia Pty Ltd, a carpet manufacturing company, has resolved alleged breaches of Victoria’s OHS Act through an Enforceable Undertaking (EU) accepted by WorkSafe Victoria, following an incident where a truck...
Read More
NEW VICTORIAN CABINET ANNOUNCED AND NEW MINISTER FOR WORKSAFE
Following the recent change in leadership of the Victorian Government the new Premier Ben Carroll unveiled a new cabinet of 20 ministries. The ministry for WorkSafe and TAC, which was previously held...
Read More
VCAT ISSUES STRONG MESSAGE ON WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT
A recent Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) decision reminds employers that failing to prevent workplace sexual harassment is a serious matter, and failing to engage with legal proceedings can make matters...
Read More