Prosecutions

It is interesting how decisions vary greatly depending on where a matter is heard. The following two recent prosecutions illustrate this. In the first, a company was convicted and fined for not providing fall protection, a SWMS and supervision to an apprentice. It was fortunate that the young worker did not fall before the situation was remedied. 

In the second case, where a worker's hand was crushed and three of his fingers 'degloved' and could not work for months, the employer was not convicted but sentenced to an 'adjourned undertaking for a period of 12 months', and to pay $12,000 to the Court Fund. 

Carpentry firm convicted and fined $10,000 for lack of fall protection

David Franklin Builders P/L was doing carpentry works at a residential construction site at Black Hill. A WorkSafe Inspector attending the workplace in October 2019 observed a third year apprentice standing on wall plates at the edge of the two story townhouse with no fall protection to prevent a fall. There was no supervision of the apprentice. The company did not have a SWMS for the work. The inspector issued a prohibition notice prohibiting all carpentry works associated with truss erection and box gutter construction. On 13 December 2019 the inspector re-attended the workplace: hand railing and scaffolding was in place, and a SWMS was produced. 

In sentencing the offender, the Ballarat Magistrates Court acknowledged the offender’s good character, lack of priors and early plea of guilty. The company was convicted and fined $10,000, plus costs of $1,662.

Worker suffers serious damage to hand

Cyco Systems Corporation P/L manufactures parts for high performance automotive engines at a small factory at Mentone. On 18 July 2019 an incident occurred when an employee's hand made contact with the linishing belt of a lathe  used in the assembly process. The incident resulted in the degloving of his small, ring and middle fingers, hyperextension of his index finger, as well as the removal of a nail. He underwent an operation and was unable to work for two to three months. The court found the company had failed to reduce or eliminate the risk of serious injury by providing adequate guarding. 

Cyco Systems pleaded guilty and was without conviction sentenced to an adjourned undertaking for a period of 12 months, and to pay $12,000 to the Court Fund with costs of $1,891.

To check for more Victorian prosecutions before the next edition, go to WorkSafe Victoria's Prosecution Result Summaries and Enforceable Undertakings webpage. 

Share Tweet

RELATED

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO SENTENCING ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS
The Victorian Government has finally released its official response to the recommendations of the State Sentencing Advisory Council's (SAC's) review of the sentencing of OHS offences. The Sentencing Advisory Council delivered the...
Read More
MISSED WARNING SIGNS LEAD TO BURNS FOR CHILD AND $140K FINE FOR QUESTACON
An Australian Government department has been fined $140,000 after a nine-year-old child suffered second-degree burns when their hands caught fire while interacting with a plasma globe at Canberra’s Questacon science and technology...
Read More
GUILLOTINE AMPUTATION RESULTS IN $150K LESSON FOR DEPT OF EDUCATION
The Department of Education has been fined $150,000 after a 15-year-old student suffered the amputation of three fingertips while using an unguarded guillotine during a jewellery design class.
Read More