ASK RENATA - PIN REFUSED & DWG DETAILS

Dear Renata 

I have had a PIN refused by WorkSafe. The inspector said this was due to it being an issue at one of my employer’s locations, away from ‘headquarters’ in Melbourne, where there is a separate DWG. But members of my DWG regularly work there, spending long periods of time at this other location. The inspector claimed that only an HSR at that location and of that DWG can issue the PIN. Is this correct?  

 As a result, I have withdrawn the PIN, but the risk is still there, and both my DWG members and I are still very concerned.  

No, I do not believe this is correctAn HSR can raise issues that affect their DWG members and if your members are working in an area or location where there is something that is putting their health or safety at risk, then you have the right to pursue it. 

The Act provides a definition of a ‘designated work group’: ‘a group of employees established under Division 1 or 2 of Part7’ – that is, a DWG is not a location, but the group of employees represented by the HSR. 

Under s58(1)(a) the OHS Act specifically gives HSRs the right to “inspect any part of a workplace at which a member of the designated work group works..” 

This begs the question: Why would this be the case unless the HSR is then able to take any OHS issue/hazard/risk to the employer for resolution? 

The OHS Act gives HSRs the right to raise OHS issues with their employer, irrespective of where in the workplace they occur, so long as they affect members of their DWG. The Act gives HSRs the right to pursue the issue if it is not resolved – by seeking the assistance of any person, by contacting WorkSafe, by issuing a PIN, or even, in some circumstances, by directing that work cease (s74).  

Generally, these powers and rights are limited to the HSR’s own DWG  – remembering that a DWG is the group of employees the HSR represents. However, in some circumstances, another DWG, another group of employees can ask an HSR who is not their own HSR to assist them. This is explained in s59 of the OHS Act. 

I believe this is where the inspector has mis-interpreted the OHS Act. My advice to you: re-issue the PIN, seek assistance from your union to attempt to have a clear discussion with the inspectors before they make their decision.  

Share Tweet

RELATED

SOLAR COMPANY FINE FOR INJURY TO SITE VISITOR
A solar installation company, JSD Electricals Pty Ltd, has received a fine of $30,000 with conviction after a site visitor fell approximately 4m through a shed skylight. Section.26(1) of the OHS Act...
Read More
VULNERABLE APPRENTICE SUBJECTED TO PERSISTENT BULLYING FOR NINE MONTHS
Window and door manufacturer Elite Windows (Vic) Pty Ltd has been fined $10,000 with no conviction after their failure to protect a vulnerable employee who was subjected to persistent workplace bullying by...
Read More
DEFENCE CONVICTED OF PSYCH RISK FAILURE UNDER FEDERAL WHS LAWS
The Department of Defence has been convicted and fined for failing to manage psychosocial risks relating to the death of a worker – the first penalty of its kind for a Commonwealth...
Read More