International news

US: regulation of chemical risks in jeopardy

Since the election of Donald Trump in the White House, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has shifted its policy focus towards reducing the 'regulatory burden' on the chemical industry. Public health and occupational health have been sacrificed for the benefit of business interests.

Current EPA policy is chipping away at the hierarchy of prevention measures. Instead of eliminating the risks at source when safer alternatives exist, the EPA now considers a ban as just one of many possible measures, and that in some cases simple mitigation of the risks could be enough. An example of this is the withdrawal of the planned ban of a solvent used as a paint-stripper: dichloromethane (DCM or methylene chloride). Tens of thousands of workers are exposed to it, despite it being highly toxic and the cause of many deaths each year. Use of DCM in most of its applications - including paint-stripping - has been  banned in the European Union since 2010. (Note it is not banned in Australia, but has an exposure standard, TWA of 50ppm).
Source: HesaMag#20, ETUI

Share Tweet

RELATED

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE INGESTION IN THE WORKPLACE
Oral exposure to hazardous substances is not often addressed during risk assessments, but a new review and analysis highlights that it may be relevant in many workplaces.
Read More
MUA AND ITF CONDEMN DETENTION AND ASSAULT OF SEIU’S DAVID HUERTA IN L.A.
MUA STATEMENT: The MUA, alongside over 700 global transport trade unions that make up the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF), condemn the violent assault and detention of SEIU Local USWW President David...
Read More
$15K FINE FOR APPRENTICE FALL
In yet another example of employers putting apprentices at risk of falls, Elotan Pty Ltd (trading as CBH Roofing) has been convicted and fined $15,000 after an apprentice plumber sustained multiple broken...
Read More