Research

Is Casual employment in Australia bad for workers?

Researchers from both Australia and the UK (Hahn, McVicar, Wooden) and assessed the impact of working in casual employment, compared with permanent employment, on eight health attributes. They also investigated the mental health impacts of casual jobs with irregular hours over which the worker reports limited control. They concluded that there was no evidence that casual employment in Australia is detrimental to self-assessed worker health. The article was published in the latest edition of the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

However, in a commentary in the same edition of the journalresearchers from the University of Washington, note that while the "changing nature of work' has received a lot of attention, 'careful definition and ascertainment of 'exposure' are paramount" when interpreting any studies.  

They examine some of the research and conclude that 'casual employment' is a different concept in Australia than it is assumed to be in many other countries. As a result, they say conclusions of Hahn et al should not be over-interpreted to suggest that 'contingent forms of employment have no health implications generally'. Further, future research will need to incorporate the multidimensional aspects of employment relations, as well as social and policy contexts in which they are embedded, that are likely to affect workers’ experience of work-related security and health. Despite these limitations, they say that an optimistic interpretation of Hahn et al’s well-done study is that it may be possible to modify employment relationships, through social policy, such that workers in non-permanent arrangements are at least somewhat protected against the inherent precariousness of market-based labour relations.

Read more: Hahn MHMcVicar DWooden M, Is casual employment in Australia bad for workers’ health? [Full textOccup Environ Med oemed 2021;78:1521 and
Trevor Peckham, Noah S Seixas, What’s casual? What’s causal? Advancing research on employment relationships and health [Full text]  Occup Environ Med oemed 2021;78

 

 

Share Tweet

RELATED

$375K FINE ISSUED IN SILICOSIS PROSECUTION
In a NSW District Court judgment, Edstein Creative has been fined $375,000 for failing to protect workers from exposure to dangerous silica dust, leading to one employee developing silicosis.
Read More
US: FLORIDA LEGISLATES AWAY CLIMATE CHANGE
Florida has passed a law that removes any mention of ‘climate change’ from state laws and policies.
Read More
BUILDER FINED $25K FOR EWP POWER LINE INCIDENT
Aras Holdings, a specialist building company, was hired to construct ten factories in Footscray and employed a sole trader for the concreting work. On April 7, 2022, an employee of the sole...
Read More